-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Heat Tutorials, fix typos. #1238
Update Heat Tutorials, fix typos. #1238
Conversation
Thank you for the PR! |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1238 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.75% 92.32% +0.57%
==========================================
Files 77 77
Lines 11080 11056 -24
==========================================
+ Hits 10166 10207 +41
+ Misses 914 849 -65
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. see 8 files with indirect coverage changes 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine to me.
Thanks 👍
CI seems to get stuck at "ci/codebase Expected — Waiting for status to be reported"... |
removed on "=" in getting started...
CI gets stuck again... this is strange since, e.g., #1236 did not get stuck |
@mtar when youre fit again, can you have a look on this? |
I think the pipeline isn't triggering because |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot @LScheib !!
Due Diligence
main
for new features, latest release branch (e.g.release/1.3.x
) for bug fixesDescription
Issue resolved: #1235
To get started with Heat I went through the documentation and particularly the provided tutorials. While doing so, I noticed a few minor linguistic mistakes and typos in code snippets, which I correct here. Also I try to slightly improve the uniformity of the given code examples.
Does this change modify the behaviour of other functions? If so, which?
no